What Bitget is launching
Bitget has rolled out “Anti-Scam Month 2026” with the theme “More Assets, Stronger Shield. Stay Safe in the Multi-Asset Era.” The exchange positions the campaign as a response to fraud pressures that grow as platforms expand beyond crypto into broader multi-asset offerings.
Alongside the initiative, Bitget says it is publishing security and fraud prevention results from 2025. Those figures are meant to show its controls are catching real-world attacker activity, not just running internal monitoring.
The 2025 security numbers Bitget highlights
Bitget’s published metrics for 2025 include interception, identification, and case handling volumes. It also claims it supported user recoveries tied to security incidents and fraudulent activity.
| Metric (Bitget, 2025) | What it claims |
|---|---|
| Malicious attack requests intercepted | More than 150,000,000 |
| High-risk malicious IP addresses identified | Over 13,000 |
| User protection cases handled | 18,135 |
| User recoveries linked to incidents/fraud | Approximately $32.3 million |
Security readers will spot the shape of the work. “Malicious attack requests” is broad, not a direct count of successful compromises. “High-risk IP addresses” points to network-level filtering or attribution. “User protection cases” suggests operational response. The $32.3 million figure is the most concrete promise, even though the scope and methodology are not explained in the provided text.
Why “multi-asset” changes the scam playbook
Bitget’s campaign rationale is straightforward. As users get access to more products and markets, scammers get more surfaces to impersonate. The exchange frames this as the “multi-asset era,” where fraud attempts can blend crypto-style tactics with broader financial lures.
That matters for users because multi-product access often increases the number of entry points. It also increases the number of fake “support,” “investment,” and “verification” scripts circulating across channels. Bitget’s decision to push an anti-scam month under that banner is an acknowledgment that current defenses must work across more than one asset category.
The part Bitget does not spell out
The provided material stops short of forensic detail. It does not break down the $32.3 million into categories. It does not say whether funds were recovered via law enforcement, platform controls, chain analysis, or other mechanisms. It also does not identify the types of fraud tied to the “user protection cases,” whether they involved phishing, social engineering, credential theft, account takeovers, or payment scams.
On the security desk, that gap matters. A recovery number without incident taxonomy can be hard to verify. Users can still take the general direction seriously, but they should treat these claims as platform-reported outcomes rather than proof of specific attack mitigation methods.
What to watch next
Anti-scam campaigns tend to produce two kinds of value. They either improve user behavior through clearer warnings or they translate into tighter operational controls that reduce real losses.
Bitget’s 2025 metrics suggest it wants to lean on the second track too, given the volume of intercepted malicious requests and case handling it claims. The next signal to watch is whether Bitget pairs Anti-Scam Month 2026 with specific, auditable controls or detailed breakdowns. In security, the difference between “we blocked threats” and “here’s how and where” is the difference between a slogan and an assurance.
“More Assets, Stronger Shield. Stay Safe in the Multi-Asset Era.” is the headline. The real test is whether users get clearer guidance and whether Bitget’s security posture keeps reducing harm as the threat surface expands.