What Santiment is watching: 30-day MVRV

Santiment says the recent market sell-off pushed several major assets into historically bad-but-favorable “buy zones” based on a single on-chain metric. The metric is 30-day MVRV.

Santiment’s MVRV tracks the average profit or loss of traders who opened positions within the last month. When that average goes deeply negative, it means most recent buyers are underwater. Santiment frames the market consequence like this. Selling pressure often follows these periods, but it can exhaust itself.

Santiment links that “exhaustion point” to a behavioral shift. It describes it as “weak hands capitulate, and long-term investors begin accumulating.”

Crucially, Santiment does not claim the indicator guarantees quick gains. It wrote that “no indicator guarantees immediate gains.” Still, the firm said its chart shows many flagged assets already started rebounding after entering those zones, and that the pattern has shown up in multiple past market cycles.

The assets that hit negative MVRV at the same time

Santiment reports that during the freefall from mid-May to early June, five major assets printed negative 30-day MVRV readings concurrently.

Here’s what it reported:

AssetSantiment 30-day MVRVSantiment zoneContext from the source text
Bitcoin (BTC)-10%“fair buy”Flagged alongside ETH and XRP during the same drawdown window
Ethereum (ETH)-12%“fair buy”Matched the negative reading timing
XRP-8%“fair buy”Also hit the same negative “buy zone” window
Chainlink (LINK)-18%“strong buy”Deeper negative reading than BTC, ETH, and XRP
Cardano (ADA)-18%“strong buy”Same -18% as LINK in the source text

Santiment’s framing is risk-aware. It says average-trader pain reaching “levels severe enough to create favorable risk-reward conditions across much of the crypto market” lines up with the early bounce it observed.

levels severe enough to create favorable risk-reward conditions across much of the crypto market

But readers should treat that as a setup description, not a payout guarantee. The source itself warns against assuming immediate gains.

Are we seeing a relief rally or just a pause

The desk-level detail here is that early rebound signals surfaced even as broader market conditions stayed messy.

At the time of writing in the source, BTC traded around $63,000, up about 1% over 24 hours. Still, CoinGecko data in the source says BTC was down nearly 11% over the prior week after dropping to $59,000 last Friday, a level it hadn’t seen since November 2024.

The source also cites analyst Merlijn The Trader, who predicted a bounce from $59,000. He also warned it may not be the full story. He compared the move to 2022, where a similar rebound showed up before the actual capitulation low.

In his view as presented by the source, BTC could push toward $65,000 to $70,000 first. He then suggested a final leg down into a DCA zone between $48,000 and $59,000.

Whether that path plays out is separate from Santiment’s metric. MVRV is about the last month’s buyer cohort sitting on losses. A “relief rally” can still be followed by more distribution if new buyers don’t absorb supply.

Where ETH and other large caps landed

ETH in the source was changing hands at just under $1,700. It was up roughly 2% on the day, but still down nearly 16% over the week.

The weekend, per the source, was rough for ETH as well. It slumped to a 14-month low near $1,500.

The source also says most other large-cap assets, including the rest of Santiment’s list, posted only modest daily recoveries. It adds that they remained deeply negative across seven-day and monthly windows.

That matters because Santiment’s MVRV signal is measured over 30 days. The source’s “still deeply negative” language implies the market did not snap back into a healthy regime, at least not yet.

What to take from this, beyond the headline

Santiment’s core claim is pattern-based. Negative 30-day MVRV readings can coincide with a later shift where capitulation pressure weakens and longer-term buyers start accumulating. In this sell-off window, BTC, ETH, and XRP shared the same “fair buy” label, while LINK and ADA showed deeper “strong buy” readings.

The immediate implication is not that rallies are guaranteed. Santiment explicitly cautioned that the indicator cannot ensure immediate gains. What it supports, per the firm, is that pain has reached levels that can create better risk-reward conditions.

The trader perspective in the source adds a second lens. A bounce can happen before a capitulation low. So the more grounded read is this. Santiment is pointing to “conditions,” while the price tape can still test those conditions before it settles.