Standard Chartered Global Head of Digital Assets Research Geoff Kendrick declared the “bottom” for Bitcoin on Friday after the asset hit about $59,000, calling that level the lowest point of the current cycle.
That’s the upbeat part. The harder part is the “why now” checklist Kendrick laid out, because his claim hinges on three catalysts that arrived at the same time and could also fade. If they fade, the market may not get the clean confirmation it wants.
What Kendrick cites as the “cycle bottom”
Kendrick’s argument starts with price action. Benzinga reports that he framed Bitcoin’s drop to roughly $59,000 as the low point of this cycle.
Then he stitched together macro and market plumbing into three converging drivers. Benzinga says these were:
-
Oil prices fell 1.5% to $86 per barrel. Benzinga links the move to a potential US-Iran peace deal Trump announced could land this weekend ahead of the G7 summit.
-
SpaceX’s $75 billion IPO launched. Kendrick argued it pulled capital out of Bitcoin ETFs because investors sold to raise cash for the offering, not because they lost faith in crypto’s fundamentals.
-
Timing. Kendrick’s framing is that these catalysts hit together on Friday, which is why the bottom could show up right there.
Benzinga notes Kendrick’s position that the ETF outflows were about liquidity management, not a fundamental break.
The risk in “winter is over” calls
Here’s the problem with “winter is over” language. It’s a narrative shortcut. Markets don’t care what a research chief wants to call the quarter. They care whether the conditions that coincided with the low point continue to support risk assets.
The first pillar is oil and geopolitics. Benzinga ties the oil drop to expectations of a US-Iran peace track before the G7 summit. If that expectation fails to materialize, oil could react. Macro can move fast. Your chart follows.
The second pillar is ETF flow interpretation. Kendrick says ETF selling reflected investors freeing cash for SpaceX rather than exiting crypto on fundamental concerns. That can be true, but it still needs a test. If post-IPO liquidity returns, the desk would expect the ETF story to look less one-off and more consistent.
The third pillar is that the bottom was caused by convergence, not by a durable shift that would keep working next week. That means investors should treat the claim as conditional, not as closure.
Why the SpaceX detail matters for crypto positioning
Benzinga’s inclusion of SpaceX’s $75 billion IPO is not trivia. In Kendrick’s logic, it gives a reason for temporary ETF stress.
If investors sell Bitcoin ETF shares to fund participation in a large IPO, that’s a mechanical flow story. It can pressure prices even when long-term conviction hasn’t changed. Kendrick’s point, as relayed by Benzinga, is that this kind of selling does not prove a fundamental thesis is broken.
But the desk would still watch for whether ETF selling stops looking “event-driven” and starts looking structural. Kendrick’s thesis gives you a test. The market will do the measuring.
Quick facts from the report
| Item | What Kendrick pointed to | Source text basis |
|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin low | Friday’s drop to about $59,000 marked the cycle low | Benzinga report of Geoff Kendrick’s remarks |
| Oil move | Oil fell 1.5% to $86 per barrel | Benzinga cites the oil change |
| Geopolitical catalyst | Trump announced a potential US-Iran peace deal could come this weekend ahead of G7 | Benzinga links the oil move to the announcement |
| IPO catalyst | SpaceX launched a $75 billion IPO | Benzinga includes the IPO figure and timing |
| ETF impact | Capital reportedly shifted out of Bitcoin ETFs to free up cash | Benzinga relays Kendrick’s explanation |
What to watch next if you buy the “bottom” framing
Benzinga doesn’t provide the missing items you’d want for a full confirmation. It gives the catalysts Kendrick believes explain the low, but not a follow-through dataset or a deadline map beyond the events themselves.
If Kendrick is right, you’d expect the market reaction tied to the oil/geopolitics angle to play out around the G7 timetable and any US-Iran progress. You’d also expect ETF flows to normalize after the IPO liquidity window.
If those catalysts don’t resolve as implied, “winter is over” risks turning into a well-timed headline rather than a durable market read.